A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted countrywide notice pursuing an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed relatives household at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of arranging breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier along with the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development will work at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a corporation director respectively, seek to construct their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, in which advancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of founded people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting made by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally inhabitants of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their preparing authorization by creating a wall past the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore parts are matter to strict controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological outcomes, specially inside of a sensitive coastal environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, which can be partly built, is in the correct position. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their watch, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal setting up disputes, the place sights of the sea are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn proof referenced within the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waist-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments, a picture that has given that come to be emblematic from the intensity of the dispute. These actions were not just symbolic; they were intended to gather visual evidence on the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Instances described, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered intimately via the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become extensively searched phrases as readers sought to know the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to more submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
In the core in the dispute is a disagreement in excess of boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely and Rene Collier Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become called meticulous in his examination of arranging paperwork, maps, and situations attached for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their motion is motivated by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have got explained their very long-standing relationship to the region as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair basically endeavoring to build a family members house in accordance with the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Particular Location of Conservation and say that every one functions happen to be performed determined by Expert information and authorized programs. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include coming into the sea during a storm, do not change the fundamental info.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute in excess of design of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for the predicament that numerous observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between personal land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have become synonymous With all the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from your sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waist-higher drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times and René Collier waded through waist-superior drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting both of those the physical reality on the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal tactic.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket should decide whether the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment right into a Specific Area of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and setting up disorders. But the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another extended once the lawful costs are already compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design is effective at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, even so the implications of the case increase further than that handle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the significance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties for example environmental security and home rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a location of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre with the dispute stands partly created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful thoughts. Whether it's going to ultimately be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will rely on the court’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin recently.